banner

Board of Education Regular Board Meeting
San Carlos ESD
June 23, 2016 6:30PM
San Carlos School District Board Room 1200 Industrial Road, Unit 9B, San Carlos, CA 94070 Open Session 6:30PM/Followed by Closed Session

1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Communications
Rationale:
 
Comments from the Public: Persons wishing to address the Board are invited to do so.In the interest of time and order, presentations from the public are limited to 3 minutes per person, per topic.


 
4. Comments
4.A. Employee Group Comments
4.B. Board Member Comments
4.C. Superintendent Comments
5. Public Hearing
5.A. Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEA) Report for Proposed Tierra Linda/Charter Learning Center Campus Rebuild Project
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Public Hearing to hear comments regarding a PEA Report for the proposed TL/CLC Campus Rebuild Project

Comments:

The SCSD has submitted a PEA Report to the Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC) for proposed TL/CLC Campus Rebuild Project.  In order for the District to be eligible for potential state funding for this project, the California Department of Education requires DTSC review and approval.  Pursuant to Education Code 17213.1 subdivision (a)(6)(A), the PEA Report is available for public review during regular business hours at the SCSD District Office, located at 1200 Industrial Road, Unit 9, San Carlos, CA and City of San Carlos Public Library, 610 Elm Street, San Carlos, CA.

The District offers to receive written public comments for a period of at least 30 calendar days and shall hold a public hearing to receive further comments.  A public hearing in the matter will be held by the Governing Board of the SCSD and any additional comments will be forwarded to the DTSC for final review and wither approve or disapprove the PEA Report within 30 calendar days of the close of the public review period.


Rationale:

The Board will conduct a hearing for the adoption of the PEA for the proposed TL/CLC Campus Rebuild Project.  

 
Financial Impact:

There is no financial cost associated with this hearing.

Attachments:
PEA Notice TL
6. Consent Agenda
Rationale:
Consent agenda items are those considered routine and for which general agreement among board members is expected, and as such do not need discussion before a vote.  Unless a board member requests that an item be removed for discussion, the entire package is voted on at once without explanation or comments.  

 
6.A. Approval of revised contract for student #1 with PALS
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval for revised contract with PALS for behavioral services

Recommended Motion:

Staff recommends Board approval of the presented contracted with PALS.

Financial Impact:

This contract increased by 1,400.00 and thus is an increase to the budget.

Attachments:
Approval of revised contract for student #1 with PALS
6.B. Approval of revised contract for student #22 with All Hands In
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval of revised contract with All Hands In for behavioral services

Recommended Motion:

Staff recommends Board approval of the presented contract with All Hands In

Financial Impact:

This contract increased by 1,584.00 and thus, is an increase to the adopted budget.

Attachments:
Approval of revised contract for student #22 with All Hands In.
6.C. Approval of E-Cycle/Tech Disposal
Speaker:
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Request to surplus obsolete technology equipment. 


Recommended Motion:

Administration seeks Board approval to surplus attached obsolete equipment from the District Technology department.

Attachments:
Arundel Obsolete Equipment
Heather Obsolete Equipment
White Oaks Obsolete Equipment
6.D. Approval of Dan Butler & Company Inspection Services for Tierra Linda/CLC Site Development Project
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval of Dan Butler & Co. as Inspector of Record for Tierra Linda/CLC Campus Rebuild Project site development.

Comments:

An Inspector of Record (IOR) is on site full time for the duration of the construction project per DSA requirement.  The IOR os a agent who acts of the District's behalf.  Duties include ensuring that building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, energy and fire construction requirements are properly met.

Several firms were asked to submit proposal to the COO and DO Owner Representative for IOR services.  Dan Butler & Co. was chosen due the firm's previous strong work on other district projects in addition to the firm's experience, strong reputation, recommendations and competitive rates. 

Rationale:

Board approval needed for service agreements/proposals.

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve Dan Butler & Co. as Inspector of Record for TL/CLC Campus Rebuild Project.

Financial Impact:

This component is for Increment 1 - site development - at rate of $6,500 per month for construction period starting approximately June 18, 2016 to finish date of around September of 2016.  Costs to be expensed to the Measure H Facilities Bond Fund.

Attachments:
Dan Butler & Co. Inspection Services for Tierra Linda Site Development Project
6.E. Approval of San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools (OMS) Organization Management System Subscription Renewal 2016-17
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval of contract with Organization Management System (OMS) with San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools.

Rationale:

Staff uses this system for registration for and tracking of professional development programs/sessions during the school year. 


 
Recommended Motion:

Staff recommends Board approval of the preented contract.


Financial Impact:

This is an annual cost.

Attachments:
San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools OMS Renewal 2016-17
6.F. Approval of Colony Agreement for the Arundel School Field Renovation
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval of Colony proposal for installation of new grass fescue sod on the existing upper Arundel field.  

Comments:

At its May 12, 2016 meeting, the Board directed staff to install natural grass at the upper Arundel field with the expectation that this would be a temporary solution for 12 to 24 months.  Three different proposals were sought asking for drain installation and 10,000 sf of new sod installation.  Proposals ranged from $29,200 to $35,000.  Based on previous experience the District's Facilities Manger had with Colony at Stanford U. and Santa Clara University, Colony was selected as the preferred vendor.  In addition, Colony submitted the least expensive proposal at $29,200.


Rationale:

Board approval needed for service contracts/proposals.

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve proposal with Colony for drain and sod installation at upper Arundel play field.

Financial Impact:

$29,200 to be financed through the District's maintenance general fund.

Attachments:
Colony - Arundel School Field Renovation 2016
6.G. Warrant Report
Quick Summary / Abstract:
Various warrants are processed during the course of the year, which the Board of Trustees is requested to approve. A warrant report is included on the consent agenda.
Comments:

Various warrants are processed during the course of the year, which the Governing Board is requested to approve.  A warrant report is included on the consent agenda each month for the Board to review.

Rationale:

Board approval needed for warrant report.

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve Warrant Report.

Attachments:
Warrant Report
6.H. Approval of Memorandum of Understanding between San Carlos School District and Sequoia Healthcare District
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval of the MOU with Sequoia Healthcare District for 2016-17.

Comments:

The District has been in partnership with Sequoia Healthcare District (SHD) for a number of years in an effort to provide health and wellness services in alignment with the Coordinated School Health model.  The grant money is specifically targeted at mental, social and physical health and wellness for students district-wide.  SHD is providing additional funding to add another .5 FTE nurse to the District for 2016-17.


Rationale:

Board approval needed for MOU agreement.

 
Recommended Motion:

Staff recommends approval of the presented MOU with Sequoia Healthcare District for 2016-17.



Financial Impact:

SHD is agreeing to provide grant funds to the District of $475,800 for 2016-17.  This is an increase of $50,000 from the current year which will used to provide an additional .5 FTE District nurse.

Attachments:
MOU between SCSD & Sequoia Healthcare District for 2016-17
6.I. Approval of Disposal of Surplus and Obsolete Materials for Central Middle School
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval to discard obsolete interactive notebooks from Centra Middle School





Rationale:
Staff seeks to recycle  3 boxes of "old" interactive notebooks,  87 in total. 

There are two ISBN numbers:

ISBN:1-58371-358-1

ISBN - 13:  978-1-58371-358-7

 
Recommended Motion:

Staff recommends approval of discarded items as presented to the Board.


Financial Impact:

No fiscal impact.

6.J. Approval of Contract with LunchMaster for 2016-2017
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff seeks Board approval of revised contract with The Lunch Master as our Food Service Vendor for 2016-17.

Comments:

We revised a few aspects of the contract to bring it in compliance with CDE regulations for vended meal contracts. 

Rationale:

The CDE requires that all money for student lunch program go through the district cafeteria fund. As such, parents will still place orders on The Lunch Master platform, but billing will route directly to SCSD accounts. Other measures have been put into place to ensure that lunch service can account for day-of sales, and communication with parents about billing can remain efficient. 

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve staff recommendation to extend this contract with the Lunch Master for 2016-17 as our Food Service Vendor

Financial Impact:

This change will affect the process for billing, but there should be no additional cost to the district because existing software (Harris Solutions) can accommodate the tasks.

Alternatives:

We have no other alternatives at this time. However, next year we will be required to go through a full RFP process because our four-year contract extension will have been reached. 

Attachments:
LunchMaster Contract 2016-2017
6.K. Approval of Personnel Report
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Board will consider approving the presented Personnel Report.

Rationale:
Staff seeks Board approval of the presented Personnel Report containing new hires, terminations, FTE, location and position changes. 

 
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends approval of the presented Personnel Report.

Attachments:
Personnel Report 62316.pdf
7. Information/Presentations
7.A. Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee 2015-16 Annual Report
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Measure "H" Bond Program Citizen's Bond Oversight Committee will submit its Annual Report for 2015-16.

Comments:

The Board created the Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee in light of the Passage of Measure H Facility Bond on November 6, 2012.  This election was conducted under Proposition 39 requiring the establishment of such committee in order to satisfy the Proposition's accountability requirements.

The Committee had three public meetings in 2015-16 and is submitting it Annual Report and Statement of Compliance.

Lauren Pachowski, Committee Member and Liaison tot he SCSD Governing Board, will submit and present the Committee's Report.



Rationale:

Measure H Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee Annual Report must be submitted tot he Governing Board per Proposition 39 accountability requirements.

 
Recommended Motion:

Information/Presentation item - no action required.

Financial Impact:

No financial impact.

Attachments:
Measure H Report 2016-06-23
7.B. Outdoor Learning Space Committee ReportWas edited within 72 hours of the Meeting
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Staff will present research that may inform standards and protocols for creating Quality Outdoor Learning Spaces.

Comments:

This presentation contains three sections:

1.  CDE standards for facilities and Physical Education instruction

2.  Existing conditions at SCSD schools

a.  Physical Activity

b.  Social Emotional Learning

c.  Content Studies

d.  Aesthetic observations

3.  Resources and recommendations for planning


    a.  Policies and protocols

    b.  Experts

     

     

    ** 6/23/16 at 7:04PM the presentation that was made to the Board was uploaded.  

    Rationale:

    Staff reviewed District Policy, CDE requirements and standards for facilities and PE instruction and met with school staff, administrators, and members of the Quality Outdoor Learning Spaces committee to observe current conditions and behaviors of students in those spaces. In addition, staff also attended a webinar with the State Water Board Commission and met with local school district facilities managers to understand considerations in the development of outdoor learning space plans. 

     
    Financial Impact:

    None at this time.

    Attachments:
    QOLS Presentation to the Board
    7.C. Surplus Property (7-11) Committee Report
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Report of the Surplus Property (7-11) Committee regarding properties directed by the Board for review.

    Comments:

    On May 28, 2015, the Governing Board approved the formation of an advisory committee to advise the District and Trustees regarding the use or disposition of three district properties: Lower western sloping side of the Heather Elementary School site; Tennis courts located at the upper Arundel Elementary School site; and the District Office located at 1200 Industrial Road, Unit 9 in San Carlos.

    The Committee met on May 5, 2016, May 17, June 1 and June 16.  A public hearing regarding these properties was held by the Committee on June 1.  

    Tom Quiggle, Committee Chair, will submit and present the Committee's report.  The 7-11 Committee's recommendation is advisory only, and need not be implemented by the Board.




    Rationale:

    The Board requested formation of the Surplus Property (7-11) Committee.  The committee is now submitting its report and recommendations per its requirements.

     
    Recommended Motion:

    Information/Presentation item - no action required.  

    Financial Impact:

    None

    Attachments:
    SurplusProperty7-11CommitteeReporttotheSanCarlosSchoolDistrictwithAppendix
    8. Discussion Items
    8.A. Annual Mandated Review of Parental Involvement Policy BP 6020Was edited within 72 hours of the Meeting
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Staff seeks Board review of current Parent Involvement Policy BP 6020


    Rationale:

    ESEA Section 1118(a) requires that we involve parents in the develop of the LEA plan and processes including improvements for schools in "Program Improvement." under Section 1116. It also requires that we help schools to plan and implement effective parental involvement activities to improve student academic achievement and school performance and that we build the schools’ and parents’ capacity for strong parental involvement.  Coordination and integration of parental involvement strategies is mandated under Part A and is specified in our LCAP process. 

    As part of our Consolidated Application for funding, we must annually conduct a review/evaluation of the content and effectiveness of the parental involvement policy. Further, we should design more effective parental involvement practices should any shortcomings be identified.




     
    Recommended Motion:

    Board review of BP 6020 and determine if changes are needed.  This policy was last updated in February, 2015 and is currently aligned with CSBA recommended language.




    Financial Impact:

    No fiscal impact.

    Attachments:
    AR 6020 - Parental Involvement
    BP 6020 - Parental Involvement
    8.B. Review of District Goals & MeasuresWas edited within 72 hours of the Meeting
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Staff will present updated measures for District Goals

    Comments:

    ** 6/22/16 at 3:36 PM Final Presentation for the Board was uploaded. 

    **6/23/16 at 3:11 PM Revised Presentation to be made to the Board was uploaded.  

    **6/23/16 at 7:23 PM Revised Presentation to be made to the Board was uploaded.  




    Rationale:

    Staff has shared measures/results of District goals at the trimester points during the 2016-2017 school year.  This is the final update with results of late Spring measures. 


     
    Financial Impact:

    No direct fiscal impact.

    Attachments:
    District Measure Presentation
    9. Discussion/Action Items
    9.A. SCSD Crossing Guard Program 2016-17
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Staff seeks approval of proposal with All City Management Services (ACMS) for school crossing guard services for 2016-17.

    Comments:

    The District implemented a pilot program for 2014-15 to address student pedestrian and bicycle safety by implementing a crossing guard service at Dartmouth/San Carlos Ave. and Arroyo/Cedar intersections.  The program met with great success and was expanded to include the Brittan/Cedar intersection in 2015-16.

    To address the Tierra Linda/CLC Campus Rebuild Project, three additional guards are recommended that will be stationed at the Dartmouth and TL Campus Entrance; TL Campus pick-up area; and Wellington and Dartmouth intersections.  These locations were determined in discussions with staff and TASC meeting on traffic safety plan for TL/CLC for 2016-17 school year.

    A crossing guard will also be stationed at the Woodland/Arroyo intersection reflecting the opening of Arroyo School in August 2016.

    The attached chart identifies the specific intersections and hours staff recommends for the 2016-17 school year.

    The District Wellness Director discussed this service need with several firms.  Due to concerns about existing service provider, ACMS was selected as the preferred vendor.



    Rationale:

    Board approval needed of service contracts/proposals.

     
    Recommended Motion:

    Approve proposal with ACMS for school crossing guard service for 2016-17.

    Financial Impact:

    Total cost of about $104,000 of which the City of San Carlos is expected to pay half.  District will pay about $52,000 funded through the General Fund.  This is a total cost increase of about $60,000 over 2015-16 due to the enhanced guard service for TL/CLC and Arroyo.

    Attachments:
    Crossing Guard Needs
    Crossing Guard Proposal
    9.B. Approval of Project Based Learning / 21st Century Skills Coach Job Description
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Staff seeks approval of the Project Based Learning / 21st Century Skills Coach Job Description presented.

    Comments:

    A PD Advisory committee was launched during this school year, comprised of teachers and administrators. Feedback was solicited from each site staff regarding key elements of effective and dynamic professional learning. In addition, feedback was gathered on key needs prospectively. One of the largest identified needs was for direct, coaching support for teachers.  Further, discussion with this year's PBL site facilitators revealed the need to approach PBL support in a different way in the coming years. As a result, this position is being recommended and will supplant the existing process PBL facilitators, providing a district-wide support of classroom teachers as we implement key initiatives of our District's Strategic Plan.


    Rationale:

    This Project Based Learning/21st Century Skills Coach position would support teachers and leaders by providing coaching, training and professional development to implement Common Core State Standards (CCSS), Project-Based Learning  (PBL), and the 5C’s (critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity and citizenship) to deepen student learning and success.  This position would report to the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services and would require strong knowledge and expertise related to CCSS, PBL and the ability to use various forms of assessment data to inform effective instructional decision-making.  This position would be a management position and is recommended to be placed in Range I of the Management salary schedule.



     
    Recommended Motion:

    Approve the Project Based Learning / 21st Century Skills Coach job description and Management Salary Placement.

    Financial Impact:

    The District would staff this management position at .60FTE on Range I of the Management Salary Schedule which has a base salary of $88,426 - $112,810 per year (pro-rated to .60FTE = $53,055 - $67,686).  

    Attachments:
    PBL 21st Century Skills Coach.pdf
    9.C. Approval of Upper Elementary Principal Salary and Work Year
    Speaker:
    Craig Baker, Superintendent
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    The Board will be asked to consider approving the salary and work calendar for the Upper Elementary Principal.

    Rationale:

    The Upper Elementary Principal will have the same daily rate as an Elementary School Principal, However, the Upper Elementary Principal will have a work calendar of 208 days per year (3 additional days than the Elementary Principal position and 2 less days than the Middle School Principal position).  

    Consequently, the following base salary is recommended for consideration and approval effective 7/1/16:

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    $98,995 $102,043 $105,091 $108,139 $111,187 $114,235 $117,283 $120,331 $123,379

     

    If approved the Board will be presented on the June 30, 2016 Regular Board Meeting with the revised 7/1/16 - 1/1/18 management salary schedules containing this new salary range.

     
    Recommended Motion:

    Approval of the Upper Elementary Principal base salary and 208 day workyear effective 7/1/16.

    10. Action Items
    10.A. Approval of Application for Categorical Program Funding
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Staff seeks Board approval of the District's Application for Funding

    Rationale:

    Per Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations Section 11308, if your district has more than 50 English learners the district must establish a District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) and involve them in the application for funding for programs that serve English learners.

    In addition, the LEA is required to review and receive approval of their Application for Funding selections with their local governing board.  As such, we are bringing this forward to the Board for approval a we apply for this categorical funding to support our learners. 


     
    Recommended Motion:

    Staff seeks Board approval of our application for funding as presented by staff.

    Financial Impact:

    This will have a substantial impact (in a positive manner) as these are key funds for reaching our students of need as outlined in our LCAP.

    Attachments:
    Application for Categorical Program Funding
    10.B. Adoption of Budget for 2016-2017Was edited within 72 hours of the Meeting
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Staff seeks approval of the proposed 2016-17 Budget. 

    Comments:

    The 2016-17 Budget reflects the fourth implementation year of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). The LCFF target will be 95.7% fulfilled in 2016-17.  

    The District is required to project finances for the current year and two subsequent years to ensure fiscal solvency.  Major assumptions per the Governor's May Revision include $1.4 B in one time funding ($725,000 for SCSD) and LCFF increase of $2.9 B ($875,000 for SCSD).  STRS employer contribution will grow to 12.58% and PERS to 13.88% costing about $2.88 million in 2016-17.

    The District's Multiyear projections show available reserve levels of $4.5 million (12.68%), $3.3 million (8.93%) and $1.5 million (4.04%) for 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19, respectively.    While the reserve level meets the State minimum mandate of 3%, the Board has expressed its desire and direction to achieve a 12 to 13% reserve level.  Unfortunately the rapid increases in STRS and PERS mandatory employer contribution rates are putting considerable strain on the operating budget with a projection of adding $1.0 million in cost in 2018-19 over 2016-17.

    Staff is proposing to return with action items at 1st Interim 2016-17 to address projected budget deficits and declining reserve levels being faced in 2017-18 and 2018-19.  

     


    ** 6/23/16 at 7:39 PM - Revised Staffing Analysis was replaced as it was presented to the Board. 

    Rationale:

    The Board is required to adopt a budget before July 1, 2016.  The County Superintendent of Schools will the approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the Adopted Budget by August 15,2016.

    Staff presented a preliminary 2016-17 budget to the Board on June 9,2016.  A Public Hearing was held that date as well.  After the Budget Adoption, the Board must certify whether or not the District is able to meet its financial obligation for the remainder of the fiscal year and two subsequent years at each of the two interim reporting periods end October 31 2016 and January 31, 2017.  The certification is stated as being positive, qualified or negative.  A positive certification means the District is able to maintain a reserve level above the State mandated minimum of 3% for the current and subsequent years.  A qualified certification would result if any of the years fell below 3%, but remained above zero.  A negative certification would mean the District has exhausted all reserves and is not able to meet its financial obligations over the three year period.

    The District's Multiyear projections show reserve level percentages of 12.68%, 8.93%, and4.04% for 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19, respectively.



     
    Recommended Motion:

    Staff recommends Board approval of the 2016-17 proposed Budget.

    Attachments:
    Fund 63 - Enterprise
    Major Budget Adoption Highlights
    MYP
    Revised Staffing Analysis presented to Board
    SACS2016 Adopted Budget
    10.C. Adoption of LCAP (Local Control Accountability Program)
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    Staff seeks Board approval of the final draft of the 2016-2019 LCAP

    Rationale:

    Per requirements of the state, the Board must adopt the District LCAP by June 30, 2016, prior to submission to the County office of Education.

    LCAP public hearing was held on June 9, 2016 to review the proposed LCAP and to obtain community, staff, parental and other stakeholder input before finalizing for Board approval. 

    Board approved LCAP will be sent to the San Mateo County Office of Education. 


     
    Recommended Motion:

    Staff recommends Board approval of the presented LCAP.

    Financial Impact:

    Budget implications are outlined in the LCAP itself as well as in the broader budget.

    Attachments:
    LCAP 6-23-16
    10.D. Resolution for Temporary Interfund Transfer at year end
    Quick Summary / Abstract:
    Staff seeks approval of resolution for Interfund borrowing from General Fund 01 to Cafeteria Fund 13.
    Comments:

    The Cafeteria Fund is projected to have negative cash balance as of June 30, 2016, due to additional salary payment combined with receipt of State and Federal payments shortly after the 30th. The San Mateo County Controller requires all funds in year end by June 27 have positive balance.

    The proposed contribution from General Fund to Cafeteria Fund will be in the amount of $72,839.


    Rationale:
    Board resolution needed for Interfund transfer between funds.
     
    Recommended Motion:
    Staff recommends Board approval for resolution for Interfund Borrowing from General Fund 01 to Cafeteria Fund 13. 
    Attachments:
    Resolution for Interfund transfer
    10.E. Approval of SCTA/SCSD Tentative Agreement - Article 13 - Professional Growth Evaluation System
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    The Board is presented for approval the tentative agreement between SCSD and SCTA of Article 13 - Professional Growth Evaluation System.

    Rationale:

    After successful negotiations between the San Carlos School District (SCSD) and the San Carlos Teachers Association (SCTA), the SCTA has ratified the following Tentative Agreement:

    *Article 13 - Professional Growth Evaluation System

    This is the final step in the approval process in order to implement the above SCTA/SCSD tentative agreement.

    Please note that the other tentative agreements between SCSD & SCTA negotiated during the 2015-16 school year, were Board approved during the Regular Board Meeting of February 11, 2016.


     
    Recommended Motion:

    Approval of Tentative Agreement between SCSD and SCTA for Article 13 - Professional Growth Evaluation System.

    Attachments:
    Tentative Agreement - Article 13.pdf
    10.F. 2016-17 Declaration of Need for Fully Qualified Educators
    Quick Summary / Abstract:

    The Board will be asked to take action on approving the 2016-17 Declaration of Need for Fully Qualified Educators.


    Comments:

    The District has 3 returning employees currently either enrolled in the 12 unit CLAD program or have passed 1 or 2 of the 3 CTEL exams and are on their way to obtaining a full CLAD authorization.  The other 4 authorizations would be for out of state new hires, who will initiate their CLAD certification process this upcoming school year. 


    Rationale:
    The Declaration of Need is submitted annually to the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, in the event the District needs to employ a person to teach outside his/her credential area or when required authorizations are needed for the upcoming year.

     
    Recommended Motion:

    Approval of the 2016-17 Declaration of Need for Fully Qualified Educators.

    Attachments:
    2016-17 Declaration of Need form.pdf
    11. Agenda Setting
    12. Announcement of Closed Session
    13. Public Comment of Closed Session Items
    14. Adjourn to Closed Session
    15. Closed Session
    15.A. Public Employee Performance Evaluation - Superintendent Evaluation G.C. 54957
    15.B. Conference with Labor Negotiators: Agency Representative: Board President, Kathleen Farley; Unrepresented Employee: Superintendent, Craig Baker
    16. Reconvene to Open Session
    17. Report from Closed Session
    18. Adjournment

    The resubmit was successful.